Loading…
Loading…
Both tools embrace spec-driven development — but at different layers. Kiro brings spec discipline to your IDE, helping you code feature by feature. Archiet generates the entire production codebase from your PRD — 9 E2B-boot-verified web stacks (Flask, FastAPI, Django, NestJS, Laravel, Go, Java Spring Boot, Rails, .NET), compliance packs, mobile, CI/CD — in one pass.
Kiro (AWS) is an IDE built around spec-driven development. You write .kiro spec files alongside your code. The specs declare what each feature should do, and Kiro uses them to guide generation and validation at the file level. You still write the application — Kiro makes that process more structured and spec-aligned.
Archiet is a cloud platform also built on spec-driven development — but at the project level. You upload a PRD. Archiet compiles it into an architectural spec (entities, workflows, compliance requirements, stack choice) and generates the entire production codebase in one pass: 500-800 files covering backend API, Next.js frontend, Expo mobile app, database migrations, authentication, CI/CD, and compliance controls.
Kiro: spec-driven coding. Archiet: spec-driven deployment.
You need Kiro's spec-driven approach but at the project level, not the file level. Kiro structures your thinking and helps you code spec-by-spec. Archiet takes that same spec discipline and applies it to the entire project in one generation pass — 500-800 files, all derived from your PRD.
Deployment is the gap Kiro doesn't close. Kiro is an IDE: you leave with better-structured code. Archiet is a deployment platform: you leave with a production ZIP you can docker compose up immediately — backend, frontend, mobile, auth, migrations, compliance controls.
Compliance cannot be retrofitted. Regulated industries need SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO 27001 controls in the initial architecture, not bolted on later. Archiet generates compliance controls automatically from your entity model and stack choice. Kiro does not.
9 stacks, one spec. If your team is polyglot, or you need to deliver for a client's existing stack, Archiet generates from the same PRD into any of 9 E2B-boot-verified web stacks (Flask, FastAPI, Django, NestJS, Laravel, Go, Java, Rails, .NET). Kiro assists in whichever language you choose — but the multi-stack generation is yours to orchestrate.
Kiro is an IDE launched by AWS that uses spec-driven development as its core workflow. You write .kiro spec files in your editor alongside your code — the specs define what your code should do, and Kiro uses them to guide code generation and validation. It's spec-driven development at the file and feature level, inside your local development environment.
The difference is scope and deployment. Kiro is a spec-driven IDE: it helps individual developers write better, spec-aligned code locally. Archiet is a spec-driven deployment platform: it takes a PRD and generates an entire production codebase — backend, frontend, mobile, database migrations, auth, compliance packs, and CI/CD — in one pass. Kiro helps you code; Archiet generates what you would have spent weeks coding.
Yes. The recommended workflow: use Archiet to generate your project from a PRD (5-10 minutes, 500-800 files). Then open the generated project in Kiro (or Cursor, or VS Code) to iterate on business logic. Archiet creates the architecture; Kiro helps you extend it spec-by-spec.
No. Archiet is cloud-agnostic. The generated ZIP deploys to AWS, GCP, Azure, DigitalOcean, or any server via docker compose. Kiro is part of the AWS ecosystem. If cloud flexibility matters for your deployment strategy, Archiet has no AWS dependency.
Kiro is free (IDE tool). Archiet starts free — one full project per month at no cost. Paid plans start at $149/mo (Builder, 2 projects) and $599/mo (Professional, 5 projects, all 9 stacks, compliance packs). The comparison isn't IDE vs. platform pricing — it's whether you want to write the code yourself (Kiro helps) or generate the complete production codebase from your PRD (Archiet).