Loading…
Loading…
Every project has the same handoff problem. The architecture gets reviewed and approved. Then someone — usually a BA or a tech lead — spends days translating architectural decisions into Jira stories. The translation is lossy. Acceptance criteria are vague. Stories don't reference the constraints that the architecture enforced.
Archiet closes this gap by making the blueprint the source of truth for the backlog. No translation needed. No handoff meeting required.
Describe your system in plain English. Archiet produces a scored ArchiMate 3.2 blueprint with layered elements, relationships, and soundness gaps — in minutes, not days.
Enter your Atlassian instance URL, account email, and API token in Settings → Integrations. Takes about 2 minutes. The same token covers Confluence.
From any blueprint, click "Push to Jira", select the project key, and confirm. Archiet creates an Epic and generates user stories from your blueprint sections.
Each story has a role-goal-benefit description and acceptance criteria. Your team can start grooming immediately — no copy-paste, no handoff meeting.
Titled from your blueprint, with a description linking back to the architecture document. Archiet creates it in your chosen project.
AI-generated from blueprint sections. Each follows the "As a [role], I want [goal] so that [benefit]" format — grounded in what the architecture actually specifies.
2–3 testable, specific criteria per story. Not generic placeholders — written from the architectural constraints and component requirements in your blueprint.
Stories are linked to the Epic automatically. Compatible with Scrum and team-managed Jira projects. Epic link field detected per-project.
BA writes stories from memory after architecture review
Archiet reads the blueprint and generates stories — before the BA opens Jira
Stories have vague acceptance criteria written under time pressure
LLM generates 2–3 testable acceptance criteria per story, grounded in the architecture
Epic created manually with no structural link to architecture
Epic title, description, and structure derived directly from the blueprint
Re-planning means rewriting all stories from scratch
Re-push updates the Epic in place — Jira history preserved, stories refreshed
Architecture and delivery planning happen in separate silos
Blueprint is the single source. Jira gets the delivery view; Confluence gets the docs
Stop writing stories from scratch after every architecture review. Archiet generates the first draft from the blueprint. You review, refine, and focus on the edge cases and stakeholder nuances — not boilerplate.
Get a structured backlog the day architecture is finalised. No waiting for a BA to translate the architecture into tickets. Sprint planning can happen immediately after the blueprint is approved.
Stories are grounded in the actual architecture — not a BA's interpretation of it. Acceptance criteria reference the real constraints. Fewer "what did we mean by this?" conversations in standup.
Architecture decisions flow directly into delivery. The gap between "we agreed on this architecture" and "the team is building to it" is eliminated. Drift detection closes the loop when code diverges.
Because Jira and Confluence share the same Atlassian API token, connecting one gives you both. While Archiet pushes epics and stories to Jira, it simultaneously exports the architecture as a structured Confluence page — so your stakeholders can read the context behind the tickets.
See the Confluence integration